Dive into the six vital elements of a valid contract in this exciting 2025 guide! Uncover the power of offer, acceptance, consideration, and beyond, with insights on privity and unilateral contracts. A thrilling case study reveals the offer vs. invitation to treat showdown in action!
Contracts form the backbone of society by establishing trust and minimising risks between parties. A contract involves an exchange of promises or actions where one party offers value in return for something from the other. Contracts are not always monetary; they can involve specific performance of obligations or agreements to refrain from certain actions, such as non-compete clauses. A valid contract creates legally binding obligations, allowing a party to pursue a civil claim for a breach. This article explores:
(A) the six essential elements of a valid contract,
(B) privity of contract,
(C) the significance of unilateral contracts, and
(D) additional considerations in contract law, followed by a case study.
Many assume a contract is formed once an offer is made and accepted, but more is required for legal enforceability. Contracts can be formal or informal, written or oral, yet must include specific elements to be binding.
A contract is valid and legally binding if the following six elements are present:
An offer is a clear, definite proposal with specific terms from one party to another, forming the foundation of a contract. The offer and acceptance framework identifies a "meeting of the minds," where parties agree on terms.
An offer can be accepted to form a binding contract, while an invitation to treat is an indication of willingness to negotiate and is not binding.
For example, a store displaying products with prices is an invitation to treat, inviting negotiation rather than committing to terms.
An invitation to treat becomes an offer only when its terms are clear, definite, and leave no room for further negotiation.
An invitation to tender is typically an invitation to treat unless it explicitly states that the most competitive bid will be accepted, making it an offer. Advertisements are generally invitations to treat, but specific promises with clear terms can constitute offers, as seen in unilateral contracts.
Acceptance is an unqualified agreement to an offer’s terms, expressed through words or conduct. A counteroffer, altering the original terms, does not constitute acceptance.
Acceptance must typically be communicated to the offeror, and silence is generally not acceptance, except in rare cases where prior dealings imply consent through conduct.
Both parties must intend the agreement to be legally binding. Agreements labelled "subject to contract" or lacking clarity on essential terms may not be enforceable.
Domestic or social agreements are often presumed not to be legally binding, and agreements to agree in the future may be void due to a lack of intention.
Consideration is essential for a contract’s enforceability, involving something of value given by the promisee (a benefit to the promisor or detriment to the promisee).
Consideration need not be of equal value, but must exist. If absent, the agreement must be formalised as a deed, which requires specific execution, such as being under seal.
A contract is illegal and unenforceable if it involves an unlawful purpose, such as fraud or illegal activities. A severability clause can ensure that if one provision is illegal, the rest of the contract remains valid.
The law presumes capacity to contract, but minors (typically under 18) and mentally disordered individuals may lack full capacity. Minors can contract for "necessaries" (essential goods or services), and failure to pay can lead to a breach claim. Contracts with mentally incapable individuals are generally void unless they grant power of attorney to another party.
A contract requires reasonably certain essential terms, such as price or consideration, to be enforceable. If these terms are unclear, the contract may be void. Courts may fill gaps in commercial contracts using mechanisms like prior dealings or implied terms, provided there is intent to be legally bound.
B. Who Can Enforce The Terms Of A Contract?
Privity of contract is a principle stating that only parties to a contract can enforce its terms or be subject to its obligations. Third parties cannot sue or be sued, even if the contract benefits them. For example, if Party A promises Party B to give a gift to Party C, Party C cannot enforce the promise.
However, in some regions, third parties may have statutory rights to enforce contract terms if the contract expressly allows it or confers a benefit on them. Parties can opt out by including a clause excluding third-party rights.
Unilateral contracts involve a promise in exchange for performance, where only one party makes a commitment until the other performs the requested act. A typical example of a unilateral contract is a reward poster for finding a lost dog. The owner of the dog promises to pay, but only if another person is able to find his/her lost dog.
Bilateral contracts are agreements where both parties exchange mutual promises, each committing to fulfil specific obligations. Unlike unilateral contracts, which are binding only upon performance, bilateral contracts create obligations for both parties from the moment the agreement is formed. These contracts are the most common type in business and personal transactions, as they involve a mutual exchange of commitments, such as in sales agreements, leases, or employment contracts.
Aspect
Unilateral Contract
Bilateral Contract
Nature of Commitment
One party makes a promise; the other performs an act.
Both parties exchange mutual promises.
Acceptance
Through performance of the requested act.
Through a promise to perform.
Obligation
Only the offeror is bound until performance occurs.
Both parties are bound upon exchanging promises.
Common Examples
Reward offers, contests, or promotional deals.
Sales agreements, leases, employment contracts.
Revocation
Cannot be revoked once performance begins.
Revocable before acceptance; binding after.
Parties Involved
Can be open to the public or a specific person.
Typically involves specific parties.
A contract may be voidable if one party makes a false statement of fact that induces the other to enter the contract. Misrepresentation must be material and relied upon by the other party.
Promissory estoppel may prevent a party from retracting a promise if the other party has relied on it to their detriment, even if no formal contract exists.
If one party benefits at another’s expense without a valid contract, courts may require restitution to prevent unjust enrichment, though this is not a contract law remedy.
A breach occurs when a party fails to perform contractual obligations. Remedies include damages, specific performance, or injunctions, depending on the breach’s nature.
Imagine Company X, a renowned music event organiser, launches a vibrant campaign to promote an exclusive concert featuring a world-famous artist. Eye-catching posters are displayed across city billboards, proclaiming: “Ultimate Concert Experience! Limited VIP Passes at $600 each, including backstage access. Only 100 passes available—grab yours now!”. To emphasise its commitment, Company X posts on its social media that it has reserved $60,000 in a dedicated account to ensure pass availability.
Individual Y, a passionate music fan, sees the poster and rushes to Company X’s online ticketing platform to purchase two VIP passes. The website indicates that the passes are sold out due to overwhelming demand. Disheartened, Individual Y submits their contact information through a waitlist form, hoping for additional passes. Later that day, Company X sends Individual Y a direct message: “Great news! We’ve released two extra VIP passes for the concert at $600 each. Reply by 10 PM tonight to secure them.” Excited, Individual Y responds within an hour, stating, “I’m in! I’ll take both passes and pay via your website tomorrow morning.”
When Individual Y attempts to complete the payment the next day, Company X informs them that the passes were mistakenly offered and have already been sold to another buyer, claiming the message was only an invitation to treat.
This scenario highlights the critical distinction between an invitation to treat and an offer, evaluated through the six essential elements of a contract:
In this case, Company X’s argument that the direct message was an invitation to treat is weak, as the message’s specific terms and deadline indicate a clear offer. Similarly, their claim that immediate payment was required for acceptance lacks merit, as the offer did not stipulate this condition. In a bilateral contract like this, acceptance is completed through clear communication of agreement, not performance (such as payment). Therefore, Individual Y’s timely response formed a binding contract, and Company X’s refusal to provide the passes after allocating them to another buyer constitutes a potential breach. Individual Y could seek remedies, such as damages for the cost of comparable passes or, if the passes are unique, specific performance to compel delivery.
This scenario illustrates the importance of distinguishing between broad promotional invitations and specific offers in commercial transactions. Businesses must craft communications carefully to avoid unintended contractual obligations, particularly in direct interactions with consumers.
If you’re ready to create a contract that’s legally sound, clear, and customised to your unique needs, DocLegal.AI has you covered. Our AI-powered platform makes it simple to generate professional contracts and other legal documents, ensuring you stay protected and compliant without the hassle. Get started with DocLegal.AI today and take the stress out of crafting agreements for your business ventures!